Archive for January, 2006

Where there’s one deer, there’s usually more

Saturday, January 28th, 2006

Driving home this evening, I saw a deer run across the street a few hun­dred feet ahead of me and in spite of not see­ing any other deer around, I fig­ured it was best to slow down a whole lot. Lucky for me, I was right to assume there’d be more as another one leapt across the street not twenty feet in front of me as I got to where the first had crossed. If I hadn’t assumed more were to fol­low, I would be both a deer killer and the proud owner of a truck with a smashed front end. Ignoring the ruin­ing my truck part, I really don’t much want to crash into a deer because then I’d be stuck with a fatally wounded deer in pain. I don’t know exactly what I’d do in that sit­u­a­tion but I did think about it a good deal after nar­rowly avoid­ing hav­ing to deal with it. In the end, I came to the con­clu­sion that the cor­rect approach would be to take the crow­bar from my trunk and beat the deer to death; sure it’s not pleas­ant but it’s bet­ter than leav­ing it to suf­fer and die slowly. I don’t much want to have to go and kill any­thing, even out of mercy; it sad­dened me enough that time I acci­den­tally ran over a fox. Damnit, now I’m remem­ber­ing that fox again. I’m such a softie, oh well, what­ever, I just don’t like killing things. I guess the moral of this story really is, where there’s one deer, there’s usu­ally another.

Lunch break auto mechanickery

Friday, January 27th, 2006

It turns out that lunch breaks are a fan­tas­tic time to get some auto repair time in. I changed two of my spark-plugs yes­ter­day before work, two on my lunch break yes­ter­day and the final two on my lunch break today. It’s per­fect; there’s nice, flat, well-lit tar­mac in our park­ing lot and I’ve got an hour of free time. I don’t need a garage as long as the weather is ok and most of the minor work I’m doing doesn’t take even an hour, so why should I bother wait­ing for a week­end to have some time dur­ing the day to work on my car (I don’t want to bother with get­ting lights to work at night). I still need to change my oil, but I’ll prob­a­bly end up doing that at home tomor­row because I don’t really want to wait for the end of the week­end and I’ve fin­ished replac­ing all my spark-plugs, so there won’t be any more work to be done on my car right in the imme­di­ate future. Oh well, even if I don’t need to do any­thing more, it’s good to know that I’ve got a good place and time to do my mechan­ick­ery when I do need it.

Acetone: Conclusions

Tuesday, January 24th, 2006

As of the most recent refill of my truck’s gas tank, I am con­fi­dent that I have enough data to draw some con­clu­sions about the effect on fuel econ­omy of using ace­tone as a fuel additive.

To recap, for any­one that might have for­got­ten or missed out, a num­ber of months ago, I came across the sug­ges­tion on the inter­net that fuel econ­omy could be improved by using a small quan­tity of ace­tone as a fuel addi­tive. Since I wasn’t ter­ri­bly con­cerned about the risk of break­ing my truck and des­per­ately wanted a way to save some money on gaso­line, I fig­ured I might as well give it a shot. I started out by buy­ing a gal­lon of pure ace­tone and adding a lit­tle bit by fun­nel every time I filled my gas tank (before the gas to encour­age mix­ing). Initially I saw what might have been an improve­ment in fuel effi­ciency but I was rely­ing on my mem­ory and quickly saw my infor­ma­tion as purely anec­do­tal. Understanding how use­less anec­do­tal infor­ma­tion is, I decided to approach the mat­ter in a sci­en­tific and con­trolled man­ner. Now, 22 tanks of gas and nearly four months later I am ready to draw con­clu­sions from my data.

I have found a near lin­ear increase in fuel effi­ciency up to a peak increase of about 10% at a con­cen­tra­tion of ace­tone of 0.2%. Further increases beyond 0.2% result in a very steep fall-off in fuel effi­ciency such that a con­cen­tra­tion of 0.25% is less fuel effi­cient than no ace­tone at all. For those that don’t want to think about con­cen­tra­tions, 0.2% ace­tone is almost exactly equal to 1/3 cup ace­tone for every 10 gal­lons of fuel.

Just to be polic­i­tal, or some­thing like that, for a moment, if I can fina­gle a 10% increase in my fuel econ­omy out of ¢10 worth of ace­tone, I am doing a huge ser­vice to my bank account and the envi­ron­ment (ace­tone doesn’t pol­lute any more than gaso­line). Now let’s just take a moment to think about how much of an impact there would be on the envi­ron­ment if every sin­gle car in America improved its fuel effi­ciency by 10%; acknowl­edg­ing that, why isn’t there a gov­ern­ment man­date on gaso­line requir­ing it to con­tain 0.2% ace­tone (or there­abouts)? My guess would be because your mon­e­tary sav­ings would come straight out of the oil com­pa­nies pock­ets, but that’s beside the point. I think every­one should start adding ace­tone to their fuel tanks, sav­ing them­selves some money, help­ing the envi­ron­ment and cut­ting back on our oil con­sump­tion. Hmm, maybe I’ll write my senator.

I should like to add the caveat that these results are true for my truck and other vehi­cles may have slightly dif­fer­ent ace­tone con­cen­tra­tion sen­si­tiv­i­ties. If you decide to fol­low my lead and add ace­tone to your vehi­cles fuel tank, you should per­form some exper­i­ments on your own to deter­mine your vehi­cles effi­ciency peak con­cen­tra­tion. You should use pure ace­tone (sol­vent from a hard­ware store), not the scented stuff you can buy at CVS. Also, if you do some­thing stu­pid and blow up your car or some­thing, it’ll be your fault alone.

Snow instead of Savannah

Monday, January 23rd, 2006

Until just a lit­tle ear­lier today, I was sched­uled to go on a busi­ness trip down to Savannah, GA but as a result of inter­cor­po­rate pol­i­tics between the cus­tomer I was going to be deal­ing with and another com­pany, they’ve asked that we put things off a lit­tle bit. It’s kind of unfor­tu­nate because I was look­ing for­ward to going to Georgia for a few days. Oh well, at least it’s snow­ing here; maybe I’ll go sled­ding later.

Sunset on Neptune

Saturday, January 21st, 2006

I’ve invented a new cock­tail, which I’ve decided to call the Sunset on Neptune because it’s blue, red and pretty. The drink looks dif­fer­ent depend­ing on what direc­tion you look at it from and your light­ing con­di­tions, rang­ing from light blue, to deep vio­let, to dark red. In addi­tion to its fan­tas­tic aes­thetic qual­i­ties, the Sunset on Neptune is a very tasty and fairly alco­holic orange/grenadine fla­vored bev­er­age. The ingre­di­ents are as fol­lows and there are a few dif­fer­ent ways to make it: (all quan­ti­ties are approx­i­mate and should be var­ied to per­sonal tastes)

  • 1 part Vodka
  • 1 part Blue Curacao
  • 2 parts orange juice soda (Polar Orange Dry, Orangina, or the like; not orange soda)
  • 1/2 part Grenadine

Take a glass full of ice (prefer­ably large cubes) and pour in the vodka. Add the orange juice soda and stir. Add the Blue Curacao to the mix­ture; now if you stir, the mix­ture will be blue, but it you don’t there will be a thin green/orange layer on top with a slightly dif­fer­ent fla­vor. Now, slowly pour the Grenadine into the mix­ture; if you stir now, the drink will be pur­ple but, if you don’t stir, you will have a red layer at the bot­tom and a blue layer on top. If you decide not to stir the Curacao or Grenadine lay­ers, you’ll get a really neat red/violet/blue/green/orange/etc. thing going with a nice fla­vor gra­di­ent as well. Overall, I’m fan­tas­ti­cally pleased with the con­coc­tion and would love to hear feed­back from other people.

Also, I’m going to go out on a limb and spec­u­late that the same thing can be done with orange juice instead of orange juice soda and I’m going to go ahead and coin that Neptune’s Screwdriver.

Oh, and if you’ve got a bet­ter name, I’m not mar­ried to Sunset on Neptune.

Kids in the Hall reunion

Thursday, January 19th, 2006

At the top of my list of rea­sons that I should be in L.A. next month is that the Kids in the Hall are doing a three night reunion thing in L.A. next month. The reunion is only being pub­li­cized through the blo­gos­phere and by word of mouth and will be at the Steve Allen Theater in L.A. on February 23, 24 and 25. Anyway, you lucky folks out in the L.A. area had bet­ter get your­self to that show and tell me that it was the awe­somest thing you’ve ever seen; while you’re at that, I think I’ll just spend some time wish­ing they’d come to Boston or New York.

Fortune Cookie: 2006-01-19

Thursday, January 19th, 2006

Emotion hin­ders your true self.
Lucky Numbers 42, 30, 15, 28, 49, 5

Commentary: Like quiet grasshop­per and spice pro­duc­ing sand­worm, for­tune com­pletely off-base.

Transformers: The Movie is teh suck?

Wednesday, January 18th, 2006

Transformers: The Movie came up in con­ver­sa­tion at work and one of my cowork­ers for­warded me a link to a rant about how much the movie sucks. I love that movie and I was expect­ing a stu­pid read that I would thor­oughly dis­agree with, but instead I find myself agree­ing with every­thing said. The rant is absolutely spot on in point­ing out that Transformers: The Movie sucks and I find no fault in the dia­tribe; even so, I love the movie and am going to take pas­sion over ratio­nal in this case.

Fortune Cookie: 2006-01-18

Wednesday, January 18th, 2006

No man is with­out
ene­mies.
Lucky Numbers 12, 14, 20, 24, 26, 33

Commentary: How awe­some is that?

Fencing

Monday, January 9th, 2006

Necessary Background: I fenced (the sport with pokey things) in high school, a whole lot. Good, now that that’s out of the way, on to the post.

One of the guys at work is a mem­ber of the fenc­ing club (Prise de Fer) that is run by my high school fenc­ing coach and I noticed this when I saw him wear­ing one of the club jack­ets. This dis­cov­ery on my part led to a brief (~1 minute) con­ver­sa­tion. Then, today, Wayne, this par­tic­u­lar co-worker of mine, relayed a mes­sage from my old coach that I should drop by CC (CCHS, my old high school) to, at the very least, say hi. I decided to go by and drag my old fenc­ing gear along, just in case I felt like fenc­ing. I ended up watch­ing the lat­ter por­tion of the meet and then head­ing over to Prise de Fer’s club space, fenc­ing for a while and hang­ing out for a lit­tle bit. Despite not hav­ing fenced in ~5 years, I’m not as out of prac­tice as I expected but I am more out of shape than I expected. Anyway, it was an awful lot of fun fenc­ing again, even though I suck now. I think that I’ve prob­a­bly found a good way to stop regret­ting that I gave up fenc­ing, ungiv­ing it up.

Incidentally, I was pretty good back in the day. I was var­sity three years in a row, cap­tain my senior year and ranked as the 163rd best, under 21 foil fencer in the United States.

Acetone and the truck status update

Monday, January 9th, 2006

It’s been a while since I’ve men­tioned my exper­i­ments adding ace­tone to my trucks fuel tank, so just to pre­vent you think­ing I’d given up on the mat­ter, here’s an update. I’ve improved the algo­rithms I’m using in my Excel spread­sheet because I was bored, so now I com­pen­sate for remain­ing ace­tone as a result of refill­ing before the tank it empty, vol­ume of ace­tone added and I get rather more infor­ma­tive analy­ses. Additionally, I’ve added a more data points, putting me at 17 tanks of fuel on the chart. Currently, data sug­gests a near lin­ear econ­omy increase for my truck of about 7% at 0.15% ace­tone con­cen­tra­tion (1MPG at 1/3 cup ace­tone). This lin­ear increase isn’t show­ing any signs of lev­el­ing off, so I’m going to start push­ing the con­cen­tra­tion up in the next few tanks. I’ll give you a bet­ter write up with more man­age­able units when I’m sat­is­fied that I’ve found the ace­tone con­cen­tra­tion of max­i­mal econ­omy for my truck. I expect that I’ll prob­a­bly repeat this exper­i­ment with my next vehi­cle, and every vehi­cle there­after for that mat­ter (as long as they still run on petrol).

Moosilauke: 1, George: a little less than 1

Saturday, January 7th, 2006

Before I get into the meat of this post, right now I’m eat­ing a Beef Stick and sharp ched­dar omelette and let me tell you, it’s fan­tas­tic. I’m mak­ing this stuff for break­fast next time I go camp­ing with the guys.

Anyway, yes­ter­day, I decided I’d set out to climb one of the White Mountains today. Taking a hike struck me as a good way to spend some time and try out my new snow­shoes (Xmas loot, kind of). I was look­ing through my list of good hikes that I want to take and I decided to try to get up Mount Moosilauke (there’s debate between whether it’s pro­nounced to rhyme with rock or rocky, but I pre­fer ponounc­ing it as though it ends in uh). The plan was to set out around 7a today, get to trail­head around 10a, reach sum­mit before 5p, turn around, camp at sun­set and fin­ish up tomor­row. That I’m writ­ing this now means I obvi­ously didn’t succeed.

The prob­lems began when I pressed snooze until 6:40a, then I had to go get some food for my trip so I ended up with set­ting out at the equiv­a­lent of 8a which put me at the trail­head around 11a. 11a was still a pretty rea­son­able start time by my fig­ur­ing but then between there being a whole bunch of snow, the trail up Moosilauke being really steep and me being plenty out of shape, I hiked woe­fully behind sched­ule. By 2:00p, I had made it up 2/3 of the ele­va­tion and 3/8 of the dis­tance, which gave me 3 hours to make it the rest of the way and find shel­ter. Figuring I wouldn’t make sum­mit before sun­down, I fig­ured I’d turn around, so as to be able to sleep in a proper bed tonight. Also, it was really cold up there (def­i­nitely <20°F, maybe <10°F but cer­tainly >0°F), which had me a lit­tle con­cerned that my 0°F sleep­ing bag might not cut it. So I took the safer approach and turned back.

Coming down, as is always the case, was mighty quick, tak­ing under an hour to cover the pre­vi­ous three’s dis­tance. Seeing as there was a whole ton and a half of snow, going down was a mix­ture of glis­sad­ing and ass slid­ing almost the whole way. Also, the steep­ness that had been a bother on the ascent made the descent fan­tas­ti­cally keen. I almost wish I’d brought a sled with me, though that’s prob­a­bly the sort of bad idea that would have tossed me off a cliff.

In sum­ma­tion: I’m fat and slow; Moosilauke is really steep; I like my new snowshoes.

Afternote: The high­light of the hike was the won­der­fully amus­ing sign on a privy by the shel­ters where I took lunch that read some­thing very nearly, ‘THERE IS NO “P” IN THIS RIVY USE THE WOODS’.

More Birfdays

Wednesday, January 4th, 2006

It turns out today is also Uncyclopedia’s first birth­day. My blog and Uncyclopedia have the same birth­day; now that’s synchronicity.

Second Needless Banter Anniversary

Wednesday, January 4th, 2006

Right now, this blog is about half an hour away from two years since fp (first post). Happy two years putting up with my yam­mer­ing, Internet. To com­mem­o­rate the occa­sion, I’ve found this fan­tas­ti­cally keen plu­gin that gen­er­ates an image show­ing what time of day I post. I’ve decided to set it to report over the past 351 days, for obvi­ous rea­sons. The graph is dis­played here and should also appear at the bot­tom of pages.

Blog Post Times Graph

Updated Schools List

Wednesday, January 4th, 2006

Having begun the process of actu­ally doing appli­ca­tion things, I have revised the list of schools to which I am apply­ing. The list, in an arbi­trary order, is as follows:

  • University of California, Berkeley
  • University of California, Los Angelas
  • University of Chicago
  • University of Minnesota
  • New York University
  • Northwestern
  • Yale

That is the final­ized list, I will be writ­ing essays and com­plet­ing appli­ca­tions in the next few days.

Déjà, Déjà Vu

Tuesday, January 3rd, 2006

One of the women at work looks rather a bit like one of my ex-girlfriends, espe­cially out of the cor­ner of my eye. This results in more than a few funny moments in my head and annoy­ing mem­ory dredg­ings. It’s quite a nuis­sance and I hope it passes in not too much time.

Unsticking Stuck LCD Pixels

Tuesday, January 3rd, 2006

Sometimes the pix­els on an LCD can become stuck, dis­play­ing only some col­ors or appear­ing com­pletely dead. These black or oddly col­ored spots are a pain in the neck but they’re not always per­ma­nent. At some point last sum­mer the Mac lap­top I was work­ing on got a stuck pixel and after scour­ing the inter­net for infor­ma­tion on how to fix such things I came across instruc­tions for fix­ing stuck pix­els on the PSP that involved play­ing a par­tic­u­lar video file, con­tain­ing RGB pulses, and mas­sag­ing the screen around the stuck pixel. The PSP tech­nique worked fan­tas­ti­cally and in a few moments my screen was free of stuck pix­els. I have a sim­i­lar prob­lem on the machine I’m using right now but this machine has no means of play­ing .mp4 files (which the PSP pixel fix­ing video is) and rather than try­ing to fig­ure out how to make it play .mp4 files, I thought I’d ImageMagick myself up a quick solu­tion. To that end, I cre­ated three ani­mated gifs that pulse at dif­fer­ent fre­quen­cies (rgb3.gif, rgb5.gif and rgb7.gif), which serve the same pur­pose as the video and are sub­stan­tially smaller in size (1.2KB vs 1.5MB). The great thing about these is they’re essen­tially plat­form inde­pen­dant and require no video codecs at all. To fix your dead pix­els, just fire up a graph­i­cal web browser, point your­self at one of the images, move the browser win­dow so that the image is under your dead pixel, mas­sage the screen a lit­tle and with luck the pixel may start work­ing again. If you don’t have any luck try one of the other fre­quen­cies and if that doesn’t work, I’m sorry.

UPDATE: If you’re here, you might be inter­ested in Unsticking Stuck LCD Pixels: A Script