Archive for July, 2009

Snark Sharking

Thursday, July 30th, 2009

How much snark should a snark shark snark if a snark shark can snark snark?

A snark shark should snark as much snark as a snark shark can snark, if a snark shark can snark snark.

Further spyjinks

Wednesday, July 29th, 2009

I am not cur­rently at lib­erty to dis­cuss where I have been or what I have been doing, which is not meant to imply or sug­gest that where I have been or what I have been doing is of suf­fi­cient impor­tance or note­wor­thi­ness as to war­rant or jus­tify its serv­ing as the topic for a dis­cus­sion were I to be at lib­erty to dis­cuss such mat­ters, which I am not.

Baldr vs. Watermelon

Monday, July 6th, 2009

We’ve been teach­ing Baldr that destroy­ing water­mel­ons is a good thing. “Why?” you might ask and the answer is clear: because Baldr attack­ing water­mel­ons is awe­some. On account of awe­some­ness and the fact that we actu­ally had two water­mel­ons lying around, there are two sets of water­melon destruc­tion involved. Proof follows.



(Matt helped a lit­tle with the sec­ond watermelon)

Boat Sketch

Monday, July 6th, 2009

Sketch of a small sailboat made  on my N810

Sketch of a small sail­boat made on my N810

This is a small sketch of a per­son sail­ing a small boat that I made on my N810’s touch­screen while pass­ing some time recently. I’m rather pleased by this lit­tle sketch so I thought that I’d toss it up here.

On airplane bandwidth and latency

Thursday, July 2nd, 2009

Having recently used Virgin America to trans­port myself across the coun­try, I was very pleased to have Internet access while I was in the air. This, how­ever, is not the sort of air­plane band­width and latency that I am going to talk about. Instead, I would like to dis­cuss a com­par­i­son between the band­width and latency of typ­i­cal Internet con­nec­tions with those asso­ci­ated with tak­ing a hard drive on an airplane.

Let’s say we com­pare a high speed (15Mbit) DSL con­nec­tion to tak­ing a mod­er­ately large hard drive (500GB) on a plane for data rates between San Francisco and Boston (~7 hours):

Bandwidth:
DSL: 15 Mbit/s
Airplane: {{500 GB} / {7 hr}} * {{1 hr} / {60 min}} * {{1 min} / {60 s}} *{{8000 Mb} / {1 GB}} approx 150 Mbit/s

Latency:
DSL: ~100ms
Airplane: >7 hours

For fun, let’s try some­thing a lit­tle big­ger on both sides: OC-768 vs Boeing 747-400F plane filled with 2TB hard drives.

Bandwidth:
OC-768: 38 Gbit/s
747-400F: {{250,000 lbs} / {7 hr}} * {{2 TB} / {1.7 lbs}} * {{1 hr} / {60 min}} * {{1 min} / {60 s}} *{{8 Tb} / {1 TB}} approx 93 Tbit/s

Latency:
OC-768: <100ms
747-400F: >7 hours

Clearly, hard dri­ves on an air­plane will win in a purely band­width dri­ven appli­ca­tion but air­planes suf­fer from incred­i­bly high latency. You will have to decide which is best choice based on your par­tic­u­lar use scenario.