Archive for the ‘movies & tv’ Category

The year of the Transformers

Thursday, February 10th, 2005

So I was watch­ing Transformers: The Movie again (yeah, I do this a lot) and I noticed a funny thing. The movie begins with the won­der­ful phrase, “The year is 2005…” So I say to myself, that’s now! This is the year of the Transformers.

Naked Lunch

Wednesday, December 15th, 2004

I just watched a very odd movie that goes by the name Naked Lunch with some folks in 433. It was a rather Fear and Loathingesque movie. It was fucked up, awe­some and I would be inclined to give it a rather emphatic +.

I ♥ Huckabees is spectacular

Thursday, October 7th, 2004

I just saw I ♥ Huckabees and it was a very strange trip through exis­ten­tial odd­ity. It was humor­ous at times, odd at oth­ers and made you really think about some things at other moments. This movie struck an inter­est­ing chord with me; I’m not sure what or where that chord is, but I can sure feel it vibrat­ing around in me some­where. I’ll have to watch this movie again and I highly rec­om­mend that other peo­ple go see it for the first time.

Also, I would love to be an exis­ten­tial detec­tive, though I’m not sure that I under­stand things enough just yet.

	Story: 3/5
	Quality: 5/5
	Oddity: 3/5
	Characters: 4/5
	Acting: 5/5
	Philosophy: 4/5
	Comedy: 3/5

	Overall: 4.5/5

Anchorman… more like Awesome

Friday, August 6th, 2004

Last night I went and saw Anchorman with some friends and it was absolutely spec­tac­u­lar. One of the best come­dies that I have seen in a while. The humor skirted the line of over-the-top a great deal but, in my opin­ion, didn’t spend too much time beyond it.

This is one of the best come­dies that I have seen in a while, and I highly rec­om­mend it.

	Story: 3/5
	Quality: 3/5
	Humor: 6/5
	Characters: 4/5

	Overall: 4/5

Spider-man is Sequeltastic

Friday, July 2nd, 2004

I saw Spider-man 2 today and I have two adjec­tives that I would like to use in describ­ing it: fun, crappy.

One thing that I kept think­ing about was how totally awe­some it would be too have 4 gigan­tic robotic arms that half have a mind of their own. The movie was pretty much worth see­ing entirely for Doc Ock. I really ought to go about invent­ing cybertech­nol­ogy (/me is a Shadowrun dork).

Also, there was a whole lot of emo­tional, chick flick stuff in the movie. As much of a shame I will be to my gen­der, I’m going to say that I don’t usu­ally mind that emo­tional, chick flick stuff too much, but in the case of Spider-man 2, it was not only over­done, but rather poorly done as well.

	Story: 2/5
	Quality: 1/5
	Characters: 3/5
	Action: 5/5
	FX: 5/5
	Badassness: 4/5
	Acting: 3/5

	Overall: 2/5

Fahrenheit 9/11

Wednesday, June 30th, 2004

I saw Fahrenheit 9/11 last night, if you haven’t heard of it, crawl out of that cave you’ve been liv­ing in. It sure is some­thing. I don’t par­tic­u­larly want to review the movie or give my opin­ion on the top­ics it addresses because I won’t do jus­tice to my own beliefs, but I rec­om­mend that peo­ple go see it and form their own opinions.

Achilles: The Movie

Sunday, June 6th, 2004

I saw Troy last night and I was both amused and very dis­ap­pointed. I came into the thing expect­ing them to cut out a great deal of stuff, but I wasn’t expect­ing them to go about com­pletely rewrit­ing the major­ity of it and chang­ing the char­ac­ters them­selves. Worst of all, though, is that they decided to pretty much write out the vast major­ity of the hero con­tin­gent of the Trojan War. Basically, the movie was loosely based on the con­cept of the Trojan War and has rel­a­tively lit­tle to do with The Illiad. Besides my dis­gust, I thought that it was rather well done and if they had cho­sen to title the movie Achilles: The Movie, I would have been totally cool with the whole thing (the The Movie part is rather key).

	Story: 2/5
	Quality: 2/5
	Characters: 2/5
	Action: 5/5
	FX: 5/5
	Accuracy: 1/5
	Pacing: 2/5

	Overall: 3/5

Kill Bill v2

Saturday, April 17th, 2004

Saw Kill Bill v2 (v2 is in this case my pre­ferred way of writ­ing vol­ume 2) tonight and I can say that I liked it. I don’t know about the end­ing though, just don’t know (won’t say more; don’t want to spoil it). They tossed in some inter­est­ing twists, more than you might expect. I would say that it’s worth the $10 you have to pay to see it, but I’m not so sure if it’s all worth the $20 it takes to see both halves (but maybe that’s just me get­ting irri­tated at movie the­aters for goug­ing the con­sumer). As an aside, I really think that some­one ought to take up an antitrust thing against all of these damned movie the­aters and the MPAA thing; $10 for a movie and then another $10 for pop­corn and a soda: out­ra­geous! (I didn’t get pop­corn and a soda tonight because it’s too expensive)

And just to toss another opin­ion in, Budd and Pai Mei are both great char­ac­ters. I espe­cially liked Pai Mei’s beard.

Bubba Ho-tep

Saturday, April 10th, 2004

Having recently watched the amaz­ingly good Bubba Ho-tep, I feel that I ought to give it a lit­tle plug. After all, it’s out on DVD and VHS and more than worth rent­ing. It’s one of those humor/horror movies that isn’t scary but is really amus­ing. Also it has Bruce Campbell, of Army of Darkness fame, as Elvis.

In case you won’t just take my word for the qual­ity of this movie, I’ll give you some more details to help con­vince you. Bubba Ho-tep is set at an old folks home in Texas some­where near the present. The main char­ac­ters are Elvis and JFK (who is, inci­den­tally, black) as geri­atrics. Now, throw a soul-eatting mummy into the mix and you have one of the worst ideas for a movie ever. In an odd twist, a really bad movie idea becomes a really amus­ing movie; which might make sense if you con­sider how many really great movie ideas make for really poor movies. In short, Bubba Ho-tep is a movie that tried to com­bine the amuse­ment value of mum­mies, Elvis, JFK, old peo­ple and the South and man­aged to pull it off.

Punch Drunk Love

Wednesday, March 31st, 2004

I just watched Punch Drunk Love (yeah I know that it’s been out for a while) and I really liked it. I tried watch­ing it once before and didn’t make it very far (this was a while ago) but this time I set out to watch it clear through and it turns out that it starts to get really inter­est­ing just after I gave up last time. Interesting char­ac­ter that Barry, a lit­tle on the psy­chotic side but I like him.

Good movie.

The Magnificent Seven: pretty good

Sunday, March 28th, 2004

I’ve been on a real movie watch­ing binge this evening. I started with Transformers: The Movie, moved on to Roujin Z, then Ghost in the Shell, Metropolis and finally The Magnificent Seven. Whole lot of movie watch­ing, some of them are pretty good movies though.

Anyway, The Magnificent Seven is a remake of Akira Kurosawa’s mas­ter­work Seven Samurai as a west­ern. They do a very good job of tak­ing the story and a lot of things from the orig­i­nal and bring­ing them to the new style; it’s very notice­ably the same story. There are, how­ever, a num­ber of changes that have been made, prob­a­bly for the slightly dif­fer­ent set­ting and audi­ence. The last time that I watched The Magnificent Seven I had not recently seen the orig­i­nal and didn’t see the sig­nif­i­cance of the changes. Having seen the orig­i­nal in the past few months and watch­ing the remake now shows me that the dif­fer­ences are really very sig­nif­i­cant and as such I can only say that The Magnificent Seven is pretty good com­pared. Please remem­ber that I con­sider Seven Samurai to be one of the great­est movies ever made.

Transformers: The Movie

Saturday, March 27th, 2004

I’m sit­ting here watch­ing the Transformers movie and remem­ber­ing how great a movie it really is. I would rank it up there as one of my favorite movies, right up with Seven Samurai and Forrest Gump. I don’t care if it’s a kids car­toon; the themes and emo­tions por­trayed are incred­i­ble. I sus­pect that I, or some­one else, could write a truly incred­i­ble paper about the var­i­ous ele­ments of this movie, but for now, I’m going to pro­vide a run­ning commentary.

The inter­per­sonal (inter­ro­bot?) inter­ac­tions are quite impres­sive. The rela­tion­ship between Megatron and Optimus Prime is one of mutual respect and almost seems to have ele­ments of friend­ship. The bat­tle between the two of them por­trays an inter­est­ing dynamic, Megatron’s unwill­ing­ness to use a weapon at the out­set and Primes unwill­ing­ness to fin­ish off Megatron. It takes the intru­sion of Hot Rod to snap them both back to real­ity and bring a con­clu­sion of the conflict.

Unicron is an inter­est­ing fig­ure, some sort of God fig­ure or Devil fig­ure. I am not sure what to make of him, but he sure is some­thing, world eat­ing power giver that he is. The bit about Megatron becom­ing Galvatron at Unicron’s hands is a very Faustian soul sell­ing kind of thing.

Megatron/Galvatron exem­pli­fies self-centered greed and a lust for power. Also, Galvatron 0wnzes. Starscream on the other hand is just a dick.

They do a pretty darned good job of mak­ing the Autobots into stereo­typ­i­cal good and the Decepticons into stereo­typ­i­cal evil. This is all done with­out going over the top or seem­ing cliche.

I’m not sure what role the two humans play in the whole thing. Daniel and his father may only be there to add a human ele­ment to the movie, or they may serve some other role; it’ll take some thinking.

The trans­for­ma­tion of Hot Rod over the course of the movie is a com­ing of age thing. In fact, as I think about it, this movie really has every impor­tant story ele­ment, except for romance. I blame the lack of romance on the plu­ral­ity of cen­tral char­ac­ters and that the trans­form­ers are androg­y­nous. Actually, I take it back, there are ele­ments of romance between RC and Hot Rod, but just barely.

I should stop now, or this post will turn into an essay. Also, I want to sit back and enjoy the movie. Suffice it to say that Transformers: The Movie is great and it’s one of very few movies that I can watch over and over again.

Encino Man

Saturday, February 21st, 2004

So, we just watched Encino Man in Happiness (433) and I’m not really sure how to put it. Most peo­ple would prob­a­bly call it a bad movie, maybe a very bad movie, but me, I was amused. Let’s see if the cast gives you any idea of the qual­ity of the film: Pauly Shore, Brendan Frasier and that guy that plays Sam in the Lord of the Rings.

Synopsis: (spoiler warn­ing) Guy likes girl. Girl doesn’t like guy. Guy digs up cave­man. Hilarity ensues. Guy gets girl.

Hey, if it’s got Pauly Shore, then it’s got to be good right? I mean, look at such unfor­get­table clas­sics as Bio-Dome, Jury Duty or In the Army Now.