Archive for the ‘politics’ Category

Influenza Influence

Saturday, May 23rd, 2009

Arising from a nap taken while sprawl­ing across three seats on MX976 from Guadalajara to San Francisco, I am reminded of a desire to com­ment on the so-called swine flu. Of the five flights taken dur­ing my trip, none have been at capac­ity and two have pro­vided me with full rows for myself. The true uti­liza­tion is in stark con­trast with the near full planes that were described when I pur­chased my tick­ets; I under­stand Mexicana was allow­ing refunds of some sort on account of the flu.

Cancun was, I have been led to under­stand, empty rel­a­tive to other years at this time. The resort at which I stayed was likely at no more than 30% occu­pancy; near full capac­ity is the norm. Other resorts and hotels were closed due to a lack of guests. This, of course, meant that we large­ley had the resort to our­selves but, self­ish­ness aside, it also means that the local econ­omy is suf­fer­ing an absolutely hor­ri­ble col­lapse and any locals with­out suf­fi­cient sav­ings may need to seek other work. Compounding with the gen­eral global down­turn, there will likely be a pro­foundly neg­a­tive effect on Cancun and other Mexican resort areas.

The response of the Mexican gov­ern­ment is rather inter­est­ing as well. The gov­ern­ment had health check­points set up at air­ports and state bor­ders. Individuals are required to fill out a ques­tion­aire as to whether or not they are suf­fer­ing any flu symp­toms and then have their tem­per­a­ture checked by ther­mal cam­era or infrared probe; nei­ther of which I sus­pect is par­tic­u­larly accu­rate. What they would do to one who fails such test­ing is unclear as they did not seem set up for any sort of quar­an­tine. Furthermore, a few tylenol, aspirin and lies ought to be enough to get any­one through. The whole exer­cise reeks of secu­rity the­ater, a topic which I fear rais­ing lest I rant far beyond your patience.

Striking “intellectual property” from my lexicon

Thursday, May 14th, 2009

I just read two fan­tas­tic pieces from the Free Software Foundation. The first, a guest post on TorrentFreak, addresses the ques­tion of Why the FSF cares about RIAA law­suits and is a very insight­ful view into the dan­gers involved in the direc­tion that copy­right, patent and trade­mark laws seem to be headed. The sec­ond arti­cle, which was linked from the first, is an arti­cle by Richard M. Stallman on the term “intel­lec­tual prop­erty”, and the dan­gers of con­flat­ing copy­rights, patents, trade­marks and phys­i­cal prop­erty. I find the arti­cle to be both inter­est­ing and insight­ful to a suf­fi­cient extent that I have decided to strike the term “intel­lec­tual prop­erty” from my lex­i­con. Henceforth, I will dis­cuss such mat­ters in the frame of what they are, not the frame that major rights hold­ing orga­ni­za­tions would like to phrase them in.

I feel that these arti­cles are both extremely well writ­ten and make strong points on the nature of copyrights/patents/trademarks. I also feel that these arti­cles give me a bet­ter van­tage point from which to dis­cuss the jux­ta­po­si­tion of copy­rights and phys­i­cal prop­erty rights. There are cer­tainly some sharp peo­ple, doing some very impor­tant things at the FSF.

Oh please, Mr. Obama, kill DST

Friday, November 21st, 2008

I’ve been irked at President-elect Obama since he voted in favor of FISA but now I hear that he might kill day­light sav­ings time. Now, you may recall that I pas­sion­ately loath day­light sav­ings time and abol­ish­ing it would shift Mr. Obama closer to my good side. Mind you, not screw­ing with my time twice a year does not quite make up for giv­ing away my rights but it is a small step in the right direction.

Fuck Daylight Savings Time

Sunday, March 9th, 2008

In all seri­ous­ness, I don’t know why we need day­light sav­ings time. All it does is make me have to change my clocks twice a year and likely miss at least one sched­uled event shortly after the tran­si­tion. Sleep sched­ules don’t have much to do with day­light so why are we try­ing to force to two to coin­cide. We really need to get rid of these pathetic ves­tiges of days past and make our time get with the time. I hereby, pub­licly request that Daylight Savings Time ten­der its res­ig­na­tion, effec­tive immediately.

Neutral Nets and Rockets that go Boom

Friday, June 23rd, 2006

I’ve started watch­ing the daily vlog (please tell me I’m not becom­ing hip) Rocketboom because it cov­ers issues that inter­est me in a style that I like and the host(ess) is cute. I men­tion this to you today both because I’ve been watch­ing it long enough to think that it’s worth men­tion­ing to the rest of you and because they actu­ally did some­thing that caused me to pause and take note. Today’s Rocketboom is prob­a­bly the best piece I have yet seen on the topic of net neu­tral­ity; don’t get me wrong, Ask A Ninja did a fine piece on net neu­tral­ity too but the piece by Rocketboom does a really good job of explain­ing why net neu­tral­ity is a really impor­tant issue and why every­one needs to tell their gov­ern­men­tal rep­re­sen­ta­tives to keep our inter­net free. I really don’t want to find myself, ten years from now, lament­ing over the way the inter­net used to be.

The Pirate Party of the United States

Wednesday, June 7th, 2006

Pirate Party of the United States Logo The Pirate Party of the United States is a newly formed polit­i­cal party that is deriv­a­tive of Sweden’s Piratpartiet. Extracted from their web­site, their plat­form is as follows:

“The Pirate Party is a newly formed world­wide polit­i­cal party with a chap­ter in the U.S.. We want to fun­da­men­tally reform copy­right law, over­haul the patent sys­tem, and ensure that cit­i­zens’ rights to pri­vacy are respected. With this agenda, and only this, we are mak­ing a bid for rep­re­sen­ta­tion in any­where we can get elected.”

Seeing as they stand for the same things that I stand for and their plat­form and agen­das do a good job of address­ing the big issues that con­cern me, I think that I might finally have found a rea­son to stop being a reg­is­tered inde­pen­dant. Also, what could be cooler than to be a reg­is­tered pirate?

I don’t think I have the right views on global warming

Tuesday, May 23rd, 2006

I recently came across the trailer for Al Gore’s new movie about global warm­ing, An Inconvenient Truth, so I fig­ured that I might as well watch it and see what’s up. The trailer on it’s own has com­pletely changed my views on global warm­ing but prob­a­bly not for the bet­ter. There was one par­tic­u­lar scene where they were show­ing what would hap­pen to var­i­ous coast­lines if the South Pole melted caus­ing sea level to rise twenty feet and I had the instant thought that when (“if” if you want to be an opti­mist) global warm­ing really kicks in, I’ll have to get a big­ger boat. Seriously, if there’s apoc­a­lyp­tic flood­ing, I’ll just pull a Kevin Costner in Waterworld, except with­out the gills, nau­ti­cal inac­cuara­cies or that whole pariah thing.

Somehow, I think the point was to get me to be scared and start fight­ing against global warm­ing not get me to think about boats. Oops.

Save the Pacific Northwest Tree Octopus

Sunday, April 9th, 2006

Save the Pacific Northwest Tree Octopus It has come to my atten­tion that the endan­gered Tree Octopus of the Pacific Northwest is suf­fer­ing through even tougher times than it has in the past and I have decided to join the effort to pre­serve this unique species. Normally, I’m too lazy to bother being proac­tive in regards to the envi­ron­ment but things have gone too far with regards to the Tree Octopus. Admittedly, I’m quite a fan of cephalopods but nonethe­less, we are doing a very poor job as dom­i­nant species here; we have a respon­si­bil­ity to the envi­ron­ment and we can­not allow such a unique and impor­tant crea­ture to go extinct.

For more infor­ma­tion on orga­nized attempts to pre­serve the Pacific Northwest Tree Ocopus, see the offi­cial preser­va­tion site. For more gen­eral cephalo­pod infor­ma­tion, I rec­om­mend this blog devoted to cephalopods.


Predictions for Iraq

Wednesday, March 1st, 2006

I caught a bit of the cov­er­age of Saddam Hussein’s trial this morn­ing on NPR on my way to work and it led me to for­mu­late a pre­dic­tion for Iraq’s future. The most inter­est­ing part of what I caugt was that, today, Hussein asked that he alone be held account­able for the actions of his regime and that the other defen­dants be acquited. To some Hussein’s request might seem like a noble effort but I’m inclined to sus­pect that Hussein is a fairly clever guy with ulte­rior motives. My pre­dic­tion is this, Saddam Hussein will try to get his accom­plices off and be impris­oned in Iraq–it is where he is a crim­i­nal, after all. Once the US has extri­cated itself from Iraq, allies of Hussein will retake con­trol of the Iraqi gov­ern­ment and free Hussein (not nec­es­sar­ily in that order). Saddam Hussein will then rule Iraq once more and the US will look like the bunch of idiots that we prob­a­bly are.

In short, I pre­dict that Saddam Hussein will rule Iraq again within 10 years, prob­a­bly sooner.

I’d Vote For Him

Monday, August 15th, 2005

Seems like it’s prob­a­bly not real, but if it is I’d totally vote for him for president.

Christopher Walken for President 2008

Norton I, Emperor of the United States and Protector of Mexico

Tuesday, April 5th, 2005

That the United States, at one time, had an Emperor has recently come to my atten­tion. I find it rather inter­est­ing that his­tory books tend to neglect the reign of Emperor Norton I when recount­ing American History. The more I read about this man, the more excep­tional he is, truly a great American and a patriot. I can hon­estly say, with great con­vic­tion that Emperor Norton I is one of my per­sonal heroes.

My 2 cents on the Election

Tuesday, November 9th, 2004

Because I see so many other peo­ple com­ment­ing on this elec­tion pol­i­tics things I want to weigh in with my view on the mat­ter. This “great divide” in our coun­try is between a whole bunch of peo­ple that are all exactly alike; the so-called-liberals are act­ing out in exactly the man­ner that they always crit­i­cize the so-called-conservatives for. Both par­ties are fight­ing for the same socio-economic sys­tem and they only dif­fer on the spe­cific moral issues that they would like to fight over. It’s a one party sys­tem and one of your can­di­dates won; quit your bitch­ing about pathetic lit­tle “issues” and start pay­ing atten­tion to what’s actu­ally wrong with our culture.

Yippee Election!

Wednesday, November 3rd, 2004

Well, the elec­tion was yes­ter­day and I voted; it was kind of cool I guess. Last night I went over to Burton-Connor to hang out with Nick and watch the results come in; the hang­ing out was more inter­est­ing than the results, which is kind of sad. It’s been pretty much dead­locked and it still is, with nei­ther can­di­date claim­ing vic­tory, though it looks like Bush has won. In the end, I only care a lit­tle bit because I see it as a one party elec­tion where we are vot­ing between Rich Capitalist A and Rich Capitalist B. I am just so dis­il­lu­sioned that I don’t really care. Maybe if Bush wins he’ll drive this coun­try into the ground so fast that no one will be able to hide that rich peo­ple own our gov­ern­ment. Ok, I’m done being cyn­i­cal and sar­cas­tic; back to apa­thy. George out.

Al-Qaeda, each and every one of them

Monday, June 14th, 2004

I con­tinue to notice that every time any indi­vid­ual is accused of ter­ror­ist like actions, they are said to have Al-Qaeda con­nec­tions. This makes me won­der, which of the fol­low­ing con­clu­sions is cor­rect: in order to be a ter­ror­ist one must obtain their Al-Qaeda mem­ber­ship card, we only care about Al-Qaeda ter­ror­ists or we want to blame all ter­ror­ism on Al-Qaeda to give it a face. Al-Qaeda, the real world equiv­a­lent to Command & Conquer: General’s GLA.

While we’re on the topic of Al-Qaeda, I know the guy that runs the al-qaeda.net web domain. He’s a nice guy actu­ally, half Egyptian, but no ter­ror­ist, mainly runs the domain as a lark so that he can send and receive email by it. I’ve been try­ing to con­vince him to turn the domain into a group blog so that we can all have fun with the thing.

I guess the point is that not every­thing Al-Qaeda is evil (at least the larks aren’t) and I don’t buy that every­thing ter­ror­ist is Al-Qaeda.

Reagan is no more

Sunday, June 6th, 2004

In case you haven’t heard, ex-president Ronald Reagan died yesterday.

Starting to care

Wednesday, May 19th, 2004

It’s finally hap­pened, I’m start­ing to give a damn about pol­i­tics (guess it had to hap­pen some­time). You might notice that I’ve added a few more blogs to my links on the left (that’s where I turn for my body politic and I will prob­a­bly add more as I start read­ing them). I try to get a decent spat­ter­ing of dif­fer­ent polit­i­cal points of view so as to be able to make my own opinions.

In case any­one cares, here’s my take on var­i­ous polit­i­cal issues right now: We’re wast­ing tons of money on a war that we shouldn’t be fight­ing. We’re bul­ly­ing the rest of the world. We’re ignor­ing most of the prob­lems that exist in our own coun­try. We’re return­ing cap­i­tal­ism to the hell that it was more than a cen­tury ago. Our edu­ca­tion sys­tem is going down the tubes. The aver­age American cares more about pop cul­ture than his or her own well being. (Needless to say, these are all bad things in my opinion).

That should serve as decent ref­er­ence for any­one that wants to know my views. Oh, and I don’t like to asso­ciate myself with any party because I believe that giv­ing a name to my belief sys­tem gives the name power at the expense of my actual beliefs (why can’t democ­rats and repub­li­cans do what they believe in and not sim­ply fol­low the party line?).

National Gas Boycott or something like that tomorrow

Tuesday, May 18th, 2004

This recently came in through AIM channels:

May 19th is national gas boy­cott day. With gas prices on the rise, some­thing must be done to send a mes­sage to the gas com­pa­nies. If no one in America buys gas on the 19th the gas com­pa­nies will lose an esti­mated $45 MILLION dol­lars! If you’re not happy with pay­ing over $2.00/gallon please do not buy gas on May 19th. Please re-post this so that it will be able to reach as many peo­ple across the coun­try as possible.

I guess that means don’t buy gas tomor­row. A lit­tle late in toss­ing the post out what with the boy­cott tomor­row. Mind you, I haven’t ver­i­fied the sta­tis­tics so don’t yell at me if they’re wrong and if it mat­ters to you, check them your­self. I don’t really know if it’ll do any­thing but we can all go one day with­out pur­chas­ing gas, so why not?